During the first two quarters of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic continued to escalate across the globe, with an increase in confirmed cases reported daily in almost every country in the world. The challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic have severely impacted the global economy. Governments throughout the world have promptly implemented measures to try and stop the spread of COVID-19, imposing lockdowns, social distancing, quarantine arrangements, restrictions on travel and public events, etc. Meanwhile, they have put in place relief measures to ease the financial burden on businesses and individuals during these difficult times.
The measures taken by the governments of Hong Kong and Macau have drawn comparisons between the two cities in terms of the methods of their governance. Following Chairman Xi’s visit to Macau to mark the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the Macau Special Administrative Region in December 2019, there has been conjecture about whether the mainland Chinese leadership will announce new policies on diversifying Macau’s gaming-dependent economy, developing it from a casino hub into an international financial centre. These new policies, once implemented, would certainly bring about a radical change in Macau’s economy and would open up new opportunities and challenges.
The article we published in the April 2017 updated readers on how the evolution of Macau’s economy has impacted investors’ business strategies; its low taxation regime, free port and lack of foreign exchange controls have created a new business environment that has attracted overseas investors. Will the upcoming new policies to transform Macau into an international financial centre result in direct competition between Macau and Hong Kong, or impact Hong Kong’s prestige as an international financial centre? Macau would also seem to face significant challenges in any future transformation into an international financial centre; for example, it will need to make significant investments in its infrastructure, supply of qualified professionals, enactment of new securities laws and so on before it can elevate its status to that of a global financial centre.
Investors who are considering making new investments in Macau and Hong Kong should take a glance at Tables 1 to 3, which show comparisons between the latest rates for profits (complementary) tax and salaries (professional) tax, as well as other relevant legislation, in the two cities.
Table 1. Latest Profits Tax rates in Hong Kong and Macau
Hong Kong Profits Tax Rates |
Macau Profits Tax (Complementary Tax) Rates |
||
---|---|---|---|
Corporations |
16.5%/8.25% |
Annual assessable profits not exceeding MOP 600,000 |
0% |
Unincorporated businesses |
15%/7.5% |
MOP 600,001 and above |
12% |
Note: Profits tax for the first HKD 2,000,000 of profit for corporations and unincorporated businesses is reduced to 8.25% and 7.5%, respectively. |
Note: Companies incorporated in Macau fall into two groups. Companies in Group A must adhere to proper accounting requirements and maintain capital levels of at least MOP 1,000,000. Companies in Group B are either filing their tax returns for the first time or do not meet the capital requirements to be included in Group A. Companies in Group B are taxed based on assessed profits, whilst those in Group A are levied on certified tax returns submitted to the Macau Finance Bureau.
|
Table 2. Latest Salaries Tax rates in Hong Kong and Macau
Hong Kong Salaries Tax Rates |
Macau Professional Tax Rates |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessable annual income (HKD)
|
Salaries Tax rates (note 2) |
Assessable annual income (MOP) |
Professional Tax rates (note a) |
||
From |
To |
|
From |
To |
|
0 |
50,000 |
2% |
0 |
144,000 |
0% |
50,001 |
100,000 |
6% |
144,001 |
164,000 |
7% |
100,001 |
150,000 |
10% |
164,001 |
184,000 |
8% |
150,001 |
200,000 |
14% |
184,001 |
224,000 |
9% |
Remainder |
|
17% |
224,001 |
304,000 |
10% |
Standard rate (note 1) |
|
15% |
304,001 |
424,000 |
11% |
|
|
|
424,001 |
and above |
12% |
Notes
|
Notes a) Professional tax is calculated on the basis of net assessable income (i.e. income earned by an employee after deducting non-taxable income and then a 30% fixed deduction) at the above progressive tax rates. The amount of professional tax due is subject to a 30% waiver according to the tax relief measures. b) Withholding taxes An employer must withhold the tax amount payable from the employee’s income. The withheld tax should be paid quarterly to the Finance Bureau in January, April, July and October. c) Filing taxes An employer must prepare a quarterly professional tax return and an annual Employer’s Return to report the remuneration earned by all employees for the quarter and the calendar year. The quarterly return must be submitted to the Finance Bureau in January, April, July and October for the previous quarter, and the annual return must be submitted in January or February for the previous year. |
There is good news for investors making investments in both cities, as they will not have to pay tax twice on a single source of income generated from their engagement in cross-border trade and investment activities. The order on a comprehensive arrangement for the avoidance of double taxation in Hong Kong and Macau was gazetted on 22 May 2020, and the order was tabled at the Legislative Council for negative vetting on 27 May 2020. The arrangement will enter into force after both cities have completed the ratification procedures for the arrangements under the comprehensive avoidance taxation agreement signed by Hong Kong in November 2019.
The highlights of the arrangement are listed below:
As well as the differences in the tax systems and tax rates in Hong Kong and Macau, investors should be aware of the differences in the related legislation in the two cities, as this will influence their investment strategies and their investment or operational costs.
There are significant variations between Hong Kong and Macau in terms of pay scale and pay structure, as well as statutory retirement benefit when hiring talent. The differences between the statutory retirement benefit systems are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Retirement benefit systems in Hong Kong and Macau
Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) |
Macau Social Security Fund (SSF) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The employer is required to set up an MPF scheme for each employee through the appointment of an MPF service provider within 60 days of the date the employment begins. Under the scheme, both employer and employee are required to contribute 5% of the total relevant income (see note) with a cap at HKD 1,500 each. |
All employers and employees are required to register with the SSF and pay contributions for employees in the contribution month that immediately follows the date their employment starts.
|
|||||
Employment terms |
Employer’s monthly MPF contribution |
Employee’s monthly MPF contribution (to be deducted from monthly salary) |
Employment terms |
Employer’s monthly contribution |
Employee’s monthly contribution (to be deducted from monthly salary) |
Total monthly contribution |
Applies to all regular and casual employees employed under full-time and part-time contracts |
5% of employee’s monthly relevant income, capped at HKD 1,500 |
5% of monthly relevant income, capped at HKD 1,500 |
Long-term employee |
MOP60 |
MOP30 |
MOP90 |
|
|
|
Casual worker (works at least 15 days in a month) |
MOP 60 |
MOP 30 |
MOP 90 |
|
|
|
Casual worker (works less than 15 days in a month) |
MOP 30 |
MOP 15 |
MOP 45 |
|
|
|
Payment of SSF contribution
|
Note: Relevant Income includes wages, salary, leave pay, fees, commission, bonuses, gratuities, perquisites or allowances, housing allowances and other housing benefit paid or payable by an employer (directly or indirectly) to an employee under a contract. It excludes severance or long-service payments.
There are also significant variations between Hong Kong’s and Macau’s employment-related legislation. The main differences are in the provisions of the Employment Ordinance of Hong Kong (and the Labor Relations Law of Macau), the minimum wage, compensation insurance for employees, and maximum working hours. As employers, investors must keep to the requirements and deadlines for complying with the relevant laws. If they are convicted of failing to comply, they may be fined or prosecuted.
Given that the processes involved in complying with these legal requirements are labour-intensive, investors may consider outsourcing this work to specialist service providers to give them peace of mind.
On the other hand, the official languages of Macau are Chinese and Portuguese, and all statutory forms and documents are provided in these two languages (whilst the official languages of Hong Kong are Chinese and English). This may trigger demand amongst multinational corporations from English-speaking countries for local professionals or outsourcing service providers who are proficient in the official languages to ensure that they are complying with the local statutory requirements.
Joseph Hong
josephhong@mccabe.com.hk