The UK introduced a new income tax charge at 20% with effect from 6 April 2019 on amounts received in connection with the exploitation of intangible property by foreign companies in low tax territories. ‘Intangible property’ is defined very broadly for these purposes and is much wider than intellectual property.
As the rules were enacted quickly, the legislation included a power of amendment by regulation before 31 December 2019 to address any deficiencies or unintended consequences in the legislation. Consequently, regulations have recently been enacted amending the legislation, and guidance has also been issued.
Companies within scope
Subject to certain limited exemptions, the charge applies to companies that are resident in a territory with which the UK does not have a ‘full’ double taxation arrangement (DTA). For these purposes, a full DTA is one with a sovereign state and which contains a non-discrimination article (modelled on the one in the OECD model convention).
The list of territories that are considered to have full DTAs has been published in the draft ORIP guidance. It is noteworthy that the new UK treaties with Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man are not listed as ‘full’ treaties. Other territories with which the UK does not have a ‘full’ DTA include, for example, Hong Kong, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands.
Certain companies resident in a full DTA territory will also remain within the charge to tax if they are subject to tax there only on sources within that territory, or on a remittance basis, or if they are excluded from treaty benefits.
Revenues subject to tax
The ORIP charge applies to the proportion of the foreign resident’s revenues (not profits) that can be regarded as derived from the exploitation of intangible property, to the extent the intangible property is used directly or indirectly to enable, facilitate or promote UK sales of goods or services. For these purposes, it does not matter whether the ultimate sale to a UK customer is made by the offshore company, a related party or an entirely unrelated third party - so the legislation is extremely wide.
Example
Exemptions
There are some limited exemptions to the rules, as follows:
The regulations also clarify that:
Anti-avoidance
A targeted anti-avoidance rule (TAAR) gives HMRC the power to counteract arrangements which aim to circumvent the legislation. The TAAR has been in effect since the date the legislation was announced in the 2018 Budget. Groups should therefore be cautious about reorganisations intended to take them out of the scope of these rules.
Treaty Relief
Companies located in territories that have treaties with the UK may be able to claim treaty relief even if the treaty is not a “full” DTA. In order to do so, they will need to meet all the usual criteria for claiming treaty benefits including, where relevant, satisfying the principal purpose test. In such cases, companies may need to consider making a formal claim in writing to HMRC.
Conclusion
In light of the regulations and guidance, any multinational organisation doing business in a low- or no-tax territory, where it is part of a supply chain selling directly or indirectly into the UK, should consider whether it will be affected by the legislation.
Tim Ferris
tim.ferris@bdo.co.uk